🚨 If you’ve been feeling the sting of rising CPMs on Meta or struggling with creative fatigue inside ASC campaigns — this one’s for you.

Maor Benaim didn’t just present a list of hacks. He delivered strategic shifts that help drive down CPCsimprove campaign stability, and make A/B testing smarter across campaign types.

Let’s break down two of the most powerful strategies you can test immediately:

🧠 1. Slash CPCs by Sending Traffic to Search-Style Pages

Meta CPCs are climbing — and your landing page could be the reason.

Maor tested the same offer using two very different destinations:

  • VSL-style landing page

  • search-style content page (article layout with text and images)

Result? The content-style page got up to 90% lower CPCs.

“It’s just like Google now. Facebook’s algorithm reads the page. If it looks like you’re delivering value, your CPC drops.”

Maor’s key insight: Platforms are rewarding advertisers for user-first experiences. That means using content layouts, not pure sales pages.

✅ Use native-looking article layouts

✅ Add structured content and relevant images

✅ Avoid sending traffic to video-only or overly advertorial pages

Reducing CPC on Meta

🧪 2. Split Your Tests by Campaign Type (ASC vs CBO)

Most media buyers A/B test creatives across all campaign types. That’s a mistake.

Maor found that the same creative + page + offer setup performed completely differently between ASC and CBO.

Why? Even though placements are similar, ASC and CBO run on different algorithms — meaning performance patterns don’t carry over.

His refined testing flow:

  • Test creatives using ABO

  • Scale winners in either CBO or ASC

  • Never test in ASC directly — and always keep test campaigns separated by structure

“Treat ASC and CBO like separate ecosystems. Don’t expect one winner to perform the same across both.”

Difference between ABO, CBO, ASC
Bonus tip: Use tracking tools like RedTrack or Voluum to isolate flows and spot winning combos per campaign structure.